I read a book written by a seer once who said that the large statues you find all over Egypt were not just fanciful representations, but rather the artists attempt to present the actual size of some who occupied that area in those days. Which sounds all rather silly until you remember the biblical statement that "there were giants in the Earth in those days".
>the ones u read about are mostly negative experiances,
Actually a lot of skills are carried over from one life to the next. If those skills are no longer relevant to society they appear as hobbies
actualy i was refering to alien abduction experiances, as in maat's story.
You would probably think I was nuts if I told you that an apparition that I took to be somewhat higher on the evolutionary scale to me told me reincarnation was so, so I won't tell you that, however, I have a much deeper appreciation for what the deacons of a lodge might represent now.
i would know better then to think u crasy. but the thing is: how do you know that this is the whole story? from my own experiace, and studying the extreme end of the spectrum as reported by others i have to conclude that what your talking about must be akin to an adult explaining nuclear physics to a small child. our physical reality based understanding of things is far to limited to see the truth for what it is and understand it properly.
anyways i think the reincarnation model might be lacking, due to the large number of people who are the reincarnation of julias ceasar.
i think perhaps a more flexible model might be the jungian thing with the archetypes.
in any case i would stress that what we have are not even realy theories, they are merely attempts at making a story that works for the purpose of making sense out of a particular set of information. and i would caution against getting to attached to one particular model, as sooner or later information will come along that will force change to or replacement of the model.