Post by 777 ΤΟ ΣΚΟΤΆΔΙ ΚΑΙ Ο ΠΑΡΆΔΕΙΣΟ on Apr 11, 2017 21:23:23 GMT
So you would listen to the 'experts'? That's not challenging, I mean I got the Cambridge History of the Bible series but am I just going to trust what those 'experts' said happended? Or am I going to do my own research and piece the puzzle together with what I have?
And God isn't everywhere, that's just a metaphor as to how God (which yet again ties to the terminology of the MOST HIGH) created everything and he is the ultimate source making him the Great Architect (though it is not so described in the scriptures) or the ALMIGHTY God (valid: I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. - Revelation 22:13).
It is certainly true that the Most High is not everywhere. He comes to Earth only occasionally - usually to sort out the battles between the Prince of Peace and the Prince of Darkness.
And yet many mystics and some ordinary people have experienced their identity with the Cosmos - experiencing themselves as or in the galaxy, with love and light extending through all the star systems.
This type of experience is based on the human spirit being part of the Spirit that underlies all manifestation. This is described in the Hindu tradition: Having pervaded the universe with a fragment of myself, I remain.
Recall the lord god that Abraham met - quoted earlier in this thread. Abraham offered to wash his feet and cooked him some food which the god then ate. This is a humanoid god. Humanoid gods deserve respect but they are minor players in the Cosmos.
12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.
13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
14 For the body is not one member, but many.
15 If the foot shall say, Because I am not the hand, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body?
16 And if the ear shall say, Because I am not the eye, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body?
17 If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?
18 But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him.
If you are a incompatible component that does not function the Most High will remove you like a tumor. And as always, alot of people don't understand that the Christian God or the God of the Holy Bible is a totalitarian system where you are forced to bend the knee or perish. It has actually been said that in the scriptures at the White Throne of Judgement he will have his men go up and force them to bend the knee only to behead them in front of the LORD. And if he is not satisfied then we will bring him another heathen to slay and bow down to him.
You have some free will but there are consequences for every action and the Most High is constantly watching over you and judging you. This bugs the hell out of people whom try to study the Bible which usually results in them becoming Hedonistic Pagans or Nihilistic Atheists. There really is no contest with the Most High Power, this is why one of the top commandments is no idol worship/no God before me. So theocracy (especially post-Seven Seals) is out of the picture. Back then when we had the Kaiser, the Czar/Tsar, the Majesty (England), and the Duce (Rome/Italy), we had religious hierarchies and absolutism where the King had absolute control over his subjects. Because we live in 'democracy', now everyone including the wicked get to have a say in the matter. So now it is already set in stone, there's no going back. We have torn the veil, and opened the Gates of the Tribulation: www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXAR5ywW_J8
Post by 777 ΤΟ ΣΚΟΤΆΔΙ ΚΑΙ Ο ΠΑΡΆΔΕΙΣΟ on Apr 11, 2017 23:54:22 GMT
To answer the first reply I won't complicate I will tell it to you plain and simple:
We are apart of Yahawah, however he is the Head and we are lower than he is. This does not mean literally however spiritually. Got it?
To answer the second reply I won't complicate I will tell it to you plain and simple:
That God of Love will be roasting in the eternal flames under the glorious Kingdom of Heaven's trial (which is the White Throne of Judgement).
What do you learn in math course? A negative times a negative is a positive. (https://www.khanacademy.org/math/arithmetic/arith-review-negative-numbers/arith-review-mult-divide-negatives/v/why-a-negative-times-a-negative-is-a-positive)
Post by 777 ΤΟ ΣΚΟΤΆΔΙ ΚΑΙ Ο ΠΑΡΆΔΕΙΣΟ on Apr 12, 2017 4:13:39 GMT
I. If you follow another God then Yahawashi will utterly destroy you but before that he will make you suffer excruciating pain and torment beyond the spectrum of unbearable suffering (https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-684X-11-12). Yet again I got family members that are Freemasons and apart of some awful cults and since the Tribulation is right around the corner (in other words, World War III) they are suffering hardcore man. And I mean HARDCORE, like eating out of the trashcan and Thai prostitutes' fecal matter (for cash and occult status) HARDCORE.
II. Yes, AOD is Jesus (Yahawashi) and AOA is God (Yahawah)
III. Flames of passion is a spirit, a passion to dance in the blood of the heathen is a wonderful example of the unimaginable glorious forthcomings of the MOST HIGH POWER.
>If you follow another God then Yahawashi will utterly destroy you
Where in the New Testament did Jesus say that? As far as I know there is only one place in the Bible where destruction of the soul is threatened.
>AOD is Jesus (Yahawashi) and AOA is God (Yahawah)
7:13-14 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him
Here we have the Son of Man coming to the Ancient of Days. So I think that they cannot be the same. Also who are they that bring the Son of Man to the AoD? Are they superior to the Son of Man that they should bring him?
"The Ancient of Ancients is at the same time the Unknown of the Unknown; He separates Himself from all, and He is not separated; for all unites with Him, as He again unites with all; there is nothing that is not in Him"
And here we have that the Ancient of Ancients is everywhere for there is nothing that is not in him. On the other hand you say your god is not everywhere.
>Flames of passion is a spirit
Is that the same as the flames of hell that you say burn off the skin of the physical body?
I am starting to suspect that you guess answers to my questions.
Post by 777 ΤΟ ΣΚΟΤΆΔΙ ΚΑΙ Ο ΠΑΡΆΔΕΙΣΟ on Apr 12, 2017 7:53:34 GMT
Some of that was sarcasm. On terms of Ancient of Days it says 'like' which means: 1. of the same form, appearance, kind, character, amount, etc. And now we are talking the Unknown of the Unknown, listen man it is simple what is described in the Bible.
> Where in the New Testament did Jesus say that?
The Old and New Testament are one in the same, they are made by the same God. This is Malachi 3:6: For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. It says it plain and clear in Leviticus 26:1: Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God.
This was getting sloppy so I will clarify, flames of passion is not a spirit it was only sarcasm to counter the sarcasm. btw that BS about that scripture: "The Ancient of Ancients is at the same time the Unknown of the Unknown; He separates Himself from all, and He is not separated; for all unites with Him, as He again unites with all; there is nothing that is not in Him" is in the Kabbalah; www.sacred-texts.com/jud/rph/rph15.htm
You CANNOT cross-reference the Bible and Kabbalah, this is cheating and mispractice. I have stated in the past that I am against all occultists and am not a Kabbalist. I don't care for what those kikes wrote in that digusting and displeasing book due to the fact that it openly discusses child sacrifice: www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5pj2pb/kabbalah_and_child_sacrifice_more_than_you_ever/. The Holy Bible and Kabbalah are apples and oranges, you cannot mix these two together. That would be akin to me pulling out a Mein Kampf quote or a quote from Don Quixote to justify a argument I was going to make.
I don't even understand why you would follow the Kabbalah, quite frankly you are better off following Liber 777 than harboring that trash. If you want to speak about something esoteric then I would like to bring to light some of the things Freemasons have been doing in the past couple of years like; Start their own magazine (www.freemasonrytoday.com/), mock us anti-Masons in commericals (www.youtube.com/watch?v=VneoEvAJX0g), start coming out with their documentaries (www.youtube.com/watch?v=xO2clRJQisk).
But meanwhile Albert Pike openly talks about Satan worship: "Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable, blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish souls? Doubt it not!" Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, p. 321, 19th Degree of Grand Pontiff."
Post by 777 ΤΟ ΣΚΟΤΆΔΙ ΚΑΙ Ο ΠΑΡΆΔΕΙΣΟ on Apr 12, 2017 21:07:49 GMT
It would be better to link up those responses into one post but it's your floor so whatever. (Tear the forum up!)
I: The Son of Man is obviously the Christ or Messiah, his name is Yahawashi. There isn't anyone like him, you know why? Because nobody on this earth in the past, present or future can go through almost unbearable torture and poverty and not sin at all. That's Yahawashi for you. Us humans do sin, but we can ask for forgiveness unless it is a act that is not possible to forgive like for instance blasphemy against the Holy Spirit/Ghost. The Ancient of Days is yet again Christ, confusing? Not when you read the Concordant Literal Version:
(CLV) Dn 7:13 I was perceiving in the visions of the night, and behold, with the clouds of the heavens One like a son of a mortal was arriving; + He came unto the Transferrer of Days, and they brought Him near before Him.
Now things change huh? I knew there was something like this that was going to pop up, King James Version was authorized 1604 and it contains contradictions that yet again is a failure of the Christian/Roman Catholic doctrine. Many have stumbled upon those words because their Bible contains contradictions that even I have to admit that Atheists are correct in their assumption. Most of these contradictions are in the new versions of the Holy Scriptures like the New International Version. This keeps both parties on edge because really it is a battle to see which can screw up the scriptures better. You know how many debates I have had with Atheists? Endless, and all of them were high tension because it was a group of people and they were bugged out with heavy demons and I mean all of them but that's for another day. These two translations are obviously completely different so I explain: The Concordant Version uses a method of translation that takes into account the superhuman perfection of the scriptural writings, even to the minutest detail.1
Mortal is human, the Transferrer of Days is the Christ and Daniel had a vision that He (Yahawah) would rule over all of us one day.
II: (CLV) 1Sa 15:29 [Doesn't change his character] + Moreover, the Permanent One of Israel does not deal falsely, and the Holy One of Israel does not repent, for He is not like a human that He should repent.
(CLV) Ja 1:17 All good giving and every perfect gratuity is from above, descending from the Father of lights, in Whom there is not mutation or shadow from revolving motion.
(CLV) Num 23:19 [Doesn't change his purpose] El is not a man that He should lie. Or a son of humanity that He should feel regret. Does He say it and then not do it Or speak and then not carry it out?
(CLV) Ro 8:29 [Doesn't change terms of salvation] that, whom He foreknew, He designates beforehand, also, to be conformed to the image of His Son, for Him to be Firstborn among many brethren.
So why would this God of the Old Testament all of the sudden leave and another takes his position? The Old Testament was Hebrew, New Testament was Greek and Latin, that's the only difference nothing else.
Figured I'd comment since this thread is the most relevant to what I have to say:
In regards to communists and fascists, I think Hitler spoke a lot of truth. However he also took that to the extreme. Which in the context of the Holy Qabalah I believe would mean it is unbalanced demonic energy (i.e, taking something to the extreme).
Christ does in fact explicitly state: 'I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.' (Revelation 2:9)
There certainly seems to be a large conspiracy taking place within multiple religions currently, most notably Zionist Judaism and Roman Catholicism.
The Qabalah from the little I've seen is a doctrine that makes sense.
Some of the quotes from the Talmud are more than questionable (ex: Christ became a sorcerer who is now in hell boiling in excrement)
From my perception, Judaism appears to be divided into LHP and RHP Judaism, but then the same could be said about any religion.
This is something that I feel a lot of people aren't willing to discuss at the risk of being labeled an anti-semite.
Ironically enough, the people that tend to get least offended when I talk about it in person are Jews.
For some reason people seem to not be able to realize that though there may be a conspiracy, not every Jewish person is plotting global world domination.
To be a bit more specific it seems to me that the family feud in the solar system plays out on Earth, with the Logos of Saturn seeking followers, mainly in Europe, resulting in ethnic cleansing, and the Logos of Mars seeking followers in the Middle East, resulting in millennia of wars.
There is a German magical group called the Brothers of Saturn. Their principle is "pitiless love" Franz Bardon based one of his books on them.
omni: In my Lodge the Secretary is a hugh bully along with control issues. if anyone even asks a question he files masonic charges against them. He controls members mostly because they are afraid of him.
Apr 16, 2018 1:07:49 GMT
foriamhim: To omni: Grow some balls, that lodge is yours as well as every member in that lodge. If you are right, its not your problem. Nobody likes the ugliness of masonic charges. Light will always illuminate darkness, don't be afraid, be a better man.
May 27, 2018 15:37:09 GMT
foriamhim: Oh, I am a new member and just wanted to say hi...
May 27, 2018 15:39:10 GMT