So do I. And then there's truth that is not subjective. The question was not the nature of existence. It was what was King James answer to the accuracy of the text after being in the hands of 50+ people ? That's not about existence. I do not need a text to tell me that I or anyone else in the text exists, and neither does anyone else. Technically everyone in the text is 5779 or less years old and counting according to record. It's like knowing that "gopher" wood +30 is 444, the same as Jesus. Still does not answer the question of accuracy. Ivan at least showed the heptadic structure was the "possession of fate". Those people are all dead. Why ignore the actual living people and it's accuracy ? Would be like saying the ptah isn't the four patriarchs, the poor, tired, afflicted and hungry. An eighth day isn't for the dead. Rather counter productive to "I am a living God." Should I just tell people masonry doesn't have an answer to why the KJV is accurate ? It's not a challenge question. People just want to understand how they got it to be so accurate.
Ok, direct experience.........here's a direct experience answer. There is no Lucifer aside from a brief reference to the very dead former king of babylon and it has absolutely nothing to do with the KJV or light. Please quit using my name association with anything that doesn't represent the intent of King James' commissioned KJV and the psalms of King David. That includes but is not limited to Leuce, Luci, Lucy, Lucinda, Lucie, Leucippe, Lucina, Lucia, Luca, Cindy, Anne or any variation of the combination or, or Luke.