|
Post by luciicul on Aug 30, 2017 17:44:30 GMT
No, the teacher is not the same person as the one who's name is a variant of Torah. Actually I was 13 and I think just being a normal teenage butt. I think the teacher was just oblivious, except he put us together, me and this other girl, because we did have the same folders, shoes strings, pencils, etc. and you would have thought we were sisters if you did not know we are not. I'm the only one who noticed. So I started looking into the motivations of why all of a sudden people just started calling me that even though I felt the change before that. Lesson learned, do not go looking into power mongers and cults alone. I responded with writing psalm 23 in runes upside down but in the correct compass direction for the text so if whomevers spirit would experience their own poopy. I just was not good at talking about it. So after years of this drawn out problem I got help on my own. Then I went to the Ramses exhibit and everything went into toilet again. But between 6-12 things were good because of a Jewish family that ran a day care. Please do not think I do not have any experiential comparison. They were good people. I do not want the impression made that I think it is necessarily a particular religion. I think they are doors being used by nasty spirits. After the Ramses exhibit it was about a year and then I got the flu 3 times, lost my home, had to withdraw from college, got a severe strep infection and had to drive myself to the hospital in snow/ice storm because it was eating into my brain cavity. She had an equally hard time but it is not my place to tell her story and rob her of her own sense of closure, which is why she brown stamps. The teacher I think was just one of many victims of a bigger picture and would not have done so given a choice. Just so that there's no miscommunication on that.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Aug 30, 2017 19:24:09 GMT
Not very helpful except to show architectural impact.
I think in the architecture there's a huge thing missing. The water is dirty. When you clean the temple with olive oil and wash the temple you cannot leave the water dirty. I think that is what Anneliese was trying to say, the water is dirty. When you leave the water dirty it just passes the problem along to someone else. I think it is also true for the understanding it is not just any house of God, or place of exorcism. Why the light was put at the bottom of the ocean, for later.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Aug 30, 2017 23:29:06 GMT
Now I have a better understanding about frequencies.
Consider this ELS, and then consider if he has rights.
Darryl Anka is in the text in a separate place as "bashar" and that is why he says he is not "bashar", because he is not. So when they take that piece of paper out of Darryl's mouth then what for Darryl ?
Darryl is not a battery.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Aug 31, 2017 3:12:50 GMT
>Darryl Anka is in the text in a separate place as "bashar"
Is it easier to interpret when the names do not match?
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Aug 31, 2017 3:47:04 GMT
No, but it's what he said about himself. It's exactly what he said but he doesn't know the origin. He just released a documentary with James Woods about his experience and "aliens". It's called First Contact. He's not an unkind person which concerns me about it the most. I've seen him before. He's not lying. He was grey in a room full of people and what he's been told is a "power source" is not a power source, it's a statue for a golem. There was a whole room full of these people. I can even describe the house. There's a phrase over the doorway, that part I made a conscious choice not to read. He's not saying anything differently from what I'm saying, except I know it comes from the text. He thinks it's aliens. They're people. I saw the people in the house who created it, just not their faces, very common in that scenario. I don't think he knows that. I knew absolutely nothing else about him until this afternoon and I knew immediately. This bothers me because he is so unwittingly vulnerable. He will say I am not bashar but I channel bashar. If you look at the text with his name listing they are not listed together. His name has two listings, and bashar has 12 listing in a completely different location, but both in the text. The truth will out. Watch it and decide for yourself. Like a weird combination of what I have been saying and what you have been saying. The names do not match because Darryl is not bashar.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Aug 31, 2017 5:48:42 GMT
I have just had a look at 2 videos of "bashar". In both cases the communicating intelligence was operating half way up the mental plane - below soul level.
The first video the intelligence was operating on 5.4 and the second time a bit lower - on 5.5 (5th subplane of the mental). So I wonder if it was different intelligences - with "bashar" being like a call sign. The channel's voice shows the low quality of the entities.
>It's called First Contact.
Some broader reading might cast doubt on such a label.
I would be wary of paying too much attention to such entities.
>He thinks it's aliens. They're people.
There have been quite a few cases where abductees with missing time/memory on being regressed find themselves on a craft filled with aliens and when they are regressed below those images the craft inhabitants look human and speak with German accents.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Aug 31, 2017 22:16:17 GMT
I didn't call his documentary first contact, he did. I know that anytime someone suggests to me that taking someone for reproductive purposes without their consent however they define it and that it's all just a misunderstanding I don't care how it's packaged or nicely expressed that's usually considered criminal by most people. In the documentary I saw he said that bashar was not an actual name and they could not give him a name per say, and that would be because in the text as an ELS code it is not a name. Bashar means message. I think he's just empathic with the architecture and being taken advantage of in his well intention, but that's what I see. I don't think it matters who's doing it but that they're taking advantage of him. Maybe he does need to read the ELS code and see it for himself. It just bothers me, he is a person.
I know there is another book in a different house that is in like a bathroom, dressing area of a house on the second floor that's covered with jewels. It opens not on either side but in the center and I think it was made by a jeweler because there's a trick to moving the pieces on the outside to get it open. It's hidden in the built in shelving of this house. Then if you go into the attic it has an area for a person(s) to live if you get the right hidden panel open to get into this section of this attic. I think this particular books whole purpose is related to dealing with golems. It's in a completely different house. I used to have dreams about both of these things, the house that's creating it and the house that's trying to prevent it, like it was two books having a war. I think it's a literal book.
Is it not his right to know so that he can make informed decisions ? Is it not a responsibility of those who do know to not keep it from these people ? I understand how it's taught is a whole other ball game. As for frequencies all I know is you can hear them if you listen, but I just ignore it because sometimes when the light is on in the attic I like to go downstairs. I'm not convinced he is in control of it at all. Can he do it while he's doing the dishes without having to sit in a chair That's a question I have about how consenting he really is.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Aug 31, 2017 22:36:03 GMT
>if you go into the attic it has an area for a person(s) to live if you get the right hidden panel open to get into this section of this attic.
As you may recall from Castaneda's writings, Don Juan says that the mind in humans is "a foreign installation". In my observation this is a valid proposition but it is more correct to say that on the highest level of the personality mind is hidden an entity that controls the human for its own interests.
Typical behavior resulting from this is that humans are often prepared to die of disease rather than admit that their lifestyle beliefs are wrong. Humans often will allow relationships to collapse rather than admit that they themselves are not very nice people.
This behavior results from a mental entity controlling the host human to protect itself. Being mental its primary asset is self esteem. All that is human gets sacrificed to protect the entity's self image.
When approached through house imagery the entity may be found in a hidden attic. The entity typically will be seen with its eyes concealed - e.g. with very dark sunglasses.
It is important to examine the walls of the attic as there will be a false wall or ceiling, perhaps with shiny surface. Behind that will be a passage leading to the immediate supervisor of the attic entity. Thus the human host is controlled through a hierarchy of entities.
It is difficult for humans to free themselves from these parasites as the human typically cannot control its thoughts. The first step is a very strict and honorable morality. This honorable morality greatly limits what the attic entity can induce the human to think and do.
As Don Juan said, all that the initiate can do is be impeccable.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Sept 1, 2017 5:17:21 GMT
Except I dream about real houses that also represent other things, dreams with more than one meaning. This one has a detached garage and barn combo, but no people or animals. It was just showing me where this book is in this house.
Adam is an unconditional kind of person, even if I'm a butt. There is no good or evil with Adam. It's not about behavior because there is no justice and mercy in a tree of good and evil. The tree of good an evil you could say is the "sin offering" tree.
Relatively recent example.........James Holmes was a golem. He didn't go to the Batman movie by accident. He was living out the ending of the preceeding Batman movie, two boats and who makes the better decision, the prisoners or the non-prisoners. Someone was using him to force a decision by example. He was not guilty of sin, rather whomever was behind it. You cannot hold a possessed person accountable for what they cannot control whether it's spoken nicely, or seriously a big pile of ugly. You can hold the spirit that never had a body accountable, including demonic behavior, which in the case of a golem would be it's "creator". He himself was part of the sin-offering just as much as all those tragically and irrevocably harmed people. Those people who died were not being judged as good or evil, they were cannon fodder. Everyone involved was a victim. It shows in his notebook. I'm not trying to offend anyone but had a hard time understanding why others could not see it. You cannot say just because someone is a poopy person and they get possessed that means they deserved it.
My brother Michael did what he did to me right after another Michael Taylor in another place murdered his wife by ripping off her face, pulling out her tongue and gouging her eyes out. That's when he got really preoccupied with everything I did. When Anneliese, which is a variation on Luci Anne died it was like it moved to our house. The only way to confirm that is if anyone still alive involved can say if she said the words "there's a man in my window". About the same time all of this was happening there was a man in my window trying to get in my room at night, and my brother tried to tell our mother and she dismissed it as a delusion. I never told my mother. My mother told me he told her years later. All of this is about the same time I got a nail in my head, then the church would put me in a closet after my mom left and would just leave me there because it had to be my behavior. I don't think a 4-5 year old can be held accountable for their moral choices, and I don't think they were a matter of moral choices either. I know I learned I have to stay away from people named Michael. Not that there are not good people named Michael, but it's like they become someone else around me. I have a personal rule no one named Michael in personal relationships even as friends. It always goes badly. I could stand perfectly still and some poopy happens. I had a friendship with a guy named Michael because I was foolish enough to believe I was just being paranoid. This guy was raised by Nazi's and I don't mean neonazi wannabe's. These were card carrying knew Hitler in person Nazi's. When he told me he could never say the word Jehovah without getting a serious beating as a child and I told him no one deserves that I can tell you that God was in the room. Every hair on my body stood up and there was this truly peaceful presence. This was a guy who put a gun to his head every night trying to decide if he should pull the trigger and I was concerned he didn't need to be left alone with his kid for visitation nights. He was not what you would call moral, but I can tell you God didn't care. Then he started to get worse and I had to tell him he needed help. My friend Terry died in the same apartment after having been in a coma 13 times from a faulty pace maker. He really was a grinch, but God didn't care. I found his body because I had a feeling I needed to go over there and that he was gone. Sure enough there he was and he had died. I do not possess enough words to express how you can tell the difference but you just know. I know not to be around people named Andrew too. Different but same problem. I know why. It's because one means like man and one means like God. Like an architectural invitation for bad things to happen.
A golem is not the same thing as someone who is being called by another person in prayer. I used to have this guy who had a statue or a crucifix on his wall but he was just praying normal thoughts people have in his house. I'm not sure what he said but I would show up and float around his house. Actually an apartment and I can give the full layout and what the light fixtures look like, the location of every thing in it, including his dirty laundry on the floor. I know that because he kept trying to fix his thermostat. I kept having this happen when he was or was not home. Then one day I was floating in his home at night and another spirit came in his house and I pushed it out the patio door. Then I dreamt I kept coming back to make sure it was gone and it did, I got mad, it got real bright and I pushed it out the door again. I came back again a few times and that was it. It was like I wasn't needed anymore.
If I have a dream about a house and the details are very symbolic and truly not anything tangible it's still about a real person. The kindest spirit I had a dream about took me in their car and then took me to his house. He had a parking garage that the cars lifted up into their parking spots and all the homes had aquariums for patios. He put me on his fuzzy white couch to sleep. That was a symbolic house and we talked by name. He was just being kind. Nothing more than that.
I finally started making an effort to stop dreaming unless it's just a freaking crisis and then it happens anyways. I can not sleep for 30 minutes to an hour without dreaming. That gets tiring. I can say I learned from experience the difference between one house meaning and the other.
You probably disagree, but I accept you are not willing to really discuss rights. Thanks for the civil respect. I do still say that Shriner pancake day at IHOP should be neutral day. Who gets mad at people for helping burned and crippled children ?
*error corrected- Jared Lee Loughner should have read James Holmes, although in relative context either could apply.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Sept 1, 2017 7:23:22 GMT
>If I have a dream about a house and the details are very symbolic
Those dreams still exist as energy fields. You may wish to pick one of the dream houses and go back into it. Go up into the roof space and look for false walls and concealed entities.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Sept 1, 2017 17:10:31 GMT
I'm going to leave with two quotes from the ELS codes:
Luci does not consent
King James knew luci was (in) codes.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Sept 2, 2017 7:06:48 GMT
You know having a conscience is sometimes a real pain in the butt.
I had suspected something I do not think you considered, so I thought well if it's like everything else this will be in there too.
You were trying to be helpful with telling me to look for false walls, or something of the like. What you do not know is they used me to make the golems, so walls or doors do not matter. I think the phrase for it is a golden calf. Now I'm going to consider vomiting since it's in the ELS.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Sept 2, 2017 9:13:20 GMT
>telling me to look for false walls
It costs nothing to look.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Sept 2, 2017 17:46:43 GMT
False walls........ You mean make sure they do not have "dragon sickness" for possessing the King's jewel? I'm not a clone, but I have a very Ripley response to it. Golem of Prague is the only time I've seen it as possibly necessary, and even then that is questionable. I know the difference between Zeus and Hades. I'm not Persephone. I'm not trying to be rude, but what part of "mother nature" is a serial killer do people not get ? If you are being told you are "created from Adam" or "evolved from" that's Hades and Persephone. The house with the book I think has everything to do with the golem of Prague. Yes, there was light before it was dark.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Sept 2, 2017 21:05:42 GMT
False walls in this case are used to conceal parts of the human mind that contain entrances from other systems. Since the connections are concealed the human does not observe the external influences and acts as if the thoughts and patterns were its own.
>The house with the book I think has everything to do with the golem of Prague.
So how do you test that hypothesis?
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Sept 3, 2017 20:08:16 GMT
Realistically, that would require having an address and I'm pretty sure it's in Europe, or was, and it's like looking for a needle in haystack. I could focus on it but I do not think it would benefit anyone at this point and except validating it still exists. Then there are personal reasons focusing on the past too much is just not something I want to venture into, Prague especially. It makes me very hostile. I don't know about you but entire families murdered, and as horrifying as it is survivors of that, passed away in some respects could have been thought of as a sick kindness. If there is one, there is another. I would think not having a copy or copies would be not practical and just unsafe considering the topical relevance. But if someone else wants to do so.......
Considering I can fly through doors and walls that might work for someone else. I get a much different picture. Indominus Rex doesn't live at this house, but if you think cuttle fish are the only ones that camouflage you might want to rethink that. Ask her if she wants something deep fried and smothered in chocolate.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Sept 3, 2017 20:30:37 GMT
>that would require having an address and I'm pretty sure it's in Europe, or was, and it's like looking for a needle in haystack.
There are many metaphysical tests that might be done. At the simplest level there is dowsing or the I Ching.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Sept 4, 2017 16:57:50 GMT
Maybe because I know there is a better way.........feel free to have at it.
|
|
|
Post by luciicul on Sept 5, 2017 0:00:16 GMT
I looked up a code I knew without ever seeing it that confirms what I've been saying, that it's Greek, Hebrew and English, not Latin. I found this one yesterday.
Latin does not have code for light.
It is not a criticism. It just does not. This is for the benefit of people who do doubt it. You can hold it in your hands and see it for yourselves.
Jehovah sent codes about war three times.
Possibly three different languages........
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Sept 5, 2017 1:38:04 GMT
>Latin does not have code for light.
Latin certainly has a word for light - lux.
What would a code for light look like?
And proving non-existence is usually done mathematically. It is easier than testing all possible examples.
|
|