|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 4, 2018 2:03:20 GMT
This would be a point to ask the community, is commentary such as this envisioned in the foundation of the forum?
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 4, 2018 2:17:31 GMT
Respectfully looking for engagement in thoughts from original members.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Jun 4, 2018 2:52:45 GMT
>How are numbers alive?
The point of the question was to encourage you to look beyond the outer form of numbers to the underlying intelligent structure.
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 5, 2018 12:14:44 GMT
I am listening, speak from the heart.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Jun 6, 2018 0:01:48 GMT
Put your attention to the Being that uses the galaxy as its body. Listen to the song of manifestation. The trills of the song manifest as natural numbers.
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 7, 2018 22:49:04 GMT
Natural numbers as in a x b as standard order of operations?
There are many different routes to a same sum. In one format or another, math is discipline, pure s the mind. The ancients practiced this from Pythagorean's, the construction and mathematical output of Pyramid Khufu, to the art of a column. I am not sure why that is not so evident today. One could easily make the argument, how far we have fallen? This is how I've always known the vast area in which you mentioned. I would really like to understand more of what you have to say and most importantly, your view. In forbearance of the background as commented.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Jun 8, 2018 3:12:38 GMT
Natural numbers being integers and not fractions, irrational or complex. The latter types manifest in the harmonics generated by the trills in the "song" of manifestation. This means that the integers have more power in the process of manifesting Reality.
> like to understand more of what you have to say
I am writing about Reality that is at the edge of my perception. My comments on numbers are sensate in origin rather than conceptual. Still, having an incentive to perceive is always useful.
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 8, 2018 11:40:20 GMT
Give me a little time to sort this.
|
|
|
Post by elijah on Jun 11, 2018 5:54:42 GMT
each cubit can be seen as a living embodiment of god..... a sum of all parts... measureing of angles hidden inside the square ...stabilizing the above with the below
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Jun 11, 2018 7:35:07 GMT
>each cubit can be seen as a living embodiment of god. A standard Earth human, having the Tree of Life embedded within, is by resonance a microcosm of the solar logos. theosophy.ph/encyclo/index.php?title=Solar_LogosIs a cubit similarly isomorphic with a level of divinity?
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 12, 2018 11:31:51 GMT
Lets first decide on how we see it. This algorithm is what I once sought for that can be measured. Metacomponents, performance components, knowledge acquisition components or other is secondary and will develop itself in searching. Here, math is rational. Thus, the interrogatory into cubits.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Jun 12, 2018 21:56:48 GMT
> Metacomponents, performance components, knowledge acquisition components
What comes before metacomponents?
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 13, 2018 1:39:05 GMT
Basic units.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Jun 13, 2018 3:19:44 GMT
What then is a basic unit - since it is more abstract than a metacomponent?
I suggest that beyond the metacomponents we find intelligence
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 16, 2018 2:22:26 GMT
elijah, How clairvoyant. How is it you knowledge this? (origins of ?) A segment and an angle is all that’s needed to energize a cubit rod in right angle theorem (as shown in the Rhind Papyrus no.53) See attachments: The components (the Gods as once viewed yes) now are geometrically driven and exercise, interpret, graduate and reason together. Each hierarchy is new levels of communication such as shown and illustrated earlier in attachment “cubits”. All supported by angles hidden inside the square. In this case, it's hypotenuses (or diameter) as the pillar. Thus, squaring actions inside a circumscribed circumference, for these were the Ancient Days. Peter2, The unfinished pyramid and all seeing eye should be viewed as a mathematical means for, revisit the picture.. Maya's cubit rod, displayed at Turin Museum.
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jun 17, 2018 15:16:29 GMT
elijah, I viewed your picture from another post, its under defined. This is why I asked you the origins of theoretical practice?
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jul 1, 2018 1:31:51 GMT
Peter2, Since you withdrawn thought, I will leave you with this final one. There are many disciplines derived, but more specifically yours: The unfinished pyramid and all seeing eye. Lets first decide on how to see it. From the base, basic conscientiousness, developed compartments: Metacomponents, performance components, knowledge acquisition components and other in tiers of communication of higher levels of being. All summed up in an evolving platonic solid. Ever wonder why you loose the ability? Was it something you should have not ate, drank or just too many EMF's? Focused mathematical sequence is the proper gateway, otherwise you waste a lifetime in the mountains without speaking a word and still end up back here cycling the same setbacks like a dog chasing its tail. Your question should be, when looking at Giza in a mathematical component sense with the logistics of distributive cubit laws on display, did Khufu make it beyond? For this was the way of our ancients... The Eye of Providence, fractional disciplined portions of sight or you will never have coherent bearings.
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Jul 1, 2018 8:49:05 GMT
My God is a God of love. Mathematics belongs to his earlier manifestation when he was a God of intelligence
|
|
|
Post by The Ancient on Jul 2, 2018 0:55:39 GMT
Such as Cupid? I'm sorry, I couldn't resist.. You are a bit vague?
My love is GOD and to unify the ancient world with the modern...
How has GOD evolved from intelligence to love?
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Jul 2, 2018 3:56:17 GMT
>How has GOD evolved from intelligence to love? If man is made in the image of god/God (both being reasonably true) then God reincarnates (re-manifests) just like humans. And just like humans God progresses to unfold more of His/Her essence. The periods of non-manifestation are known as pralaya theosophy.wiki/en/Pralaya
|
|