Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 11:26:32 GMT
Post by Tamrin on Mar 2, 2014 11:26:32 GMT
Can you point to any breach of those rules?
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 14:27:28 GMT
Post by sammy on Mar 2, 2014 14:27:28 GMT
Tamrin when I look back in this thread and re-read the posts. Its overly clear you wanted an argument. However the rest of us in the discussion, were pondering possible avenues of spirit. Since you have chimed in, it has been nothing but an argument that I am still working through to get back to the original topic. You say you don't think a spirit could pass through a lifeless planet, fine, and just leave it at that. There was a reason no one had responded to your first post in this thread, and it wasn't because we didn't read it. I agree, Tamrin you are very clever, for sure. Just try not to let it take you astray. This topic was trying to be for fun, I would like it to return to that.
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 15:13:28 GMT
Post by billmcelligott on Mar 2, 2014 15:13:28 GMT
Bro. Philip
Some people I can chat to with a modest amount of comedic rhetoric some I have to hit with a large sldge hammer.
Let us use logic in place of rules.
following on what I have already said.
I have copied this from another well know masonic Forum
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 16:12:50 GMT
Post by Tamrin on Mar 2, 2014 16:12:50 GMT
Bro. Philip Some people I can chat to with a modest amount of comedic rhetoric some I have to hit with a large sldge hammer. Let us use logic in place of rules. following on what I have already said. I have copied this from another well know masonic Forum Each to his own. The policy HERE is purportedly:
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 16:23:17 GMT
Post by Tamrin on Mar 2, 2014 16:23:17 GMT
Tamrin when I look back in this thread and re-read the posts. Its overly clear you wanted an argument. However the rest of us in the discussion, were pondering possible avenues of spirit. Since you have chimed in, it has been nothing but an argument that I am still working through to get back to the original topic. You say you don't think a spirit could pass through a lifeless planet, fine, and just leave it at that. There was a reason no one had responded to your first post in this thread, and it wasn't because we didn't read it. I agree, Tamrin you are very clever, for sure. Just try not to let it take you astray. This topic was trying to be for fun, I would like it to return to that. ?? YOU responded to my first post in this thread in the very next post!? I had made a reasonable point and YOU thanked me for it!? (BTW, you are now twisting my words as to the lifeless planet bit).
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 16:32:37 GMT
Post by Tamrin on Mar 2, 2014 16:32:37 GMT
Philip, you are an articulate clever individual. Joel Cairo: 'You always have a very smooth explanation ready.' Sam Spade: 'What do you want me to do, learn to stutter?'
Dashiell Hammett, The Maltese Falcon
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 16:35:59 GMT
Post by sammy on Mar 2, 2014 16:35:59 GMT
Tamrin when I look back in this thread and re-read the posts. Its overly clear you wanted an argument. However the rest of us in the discussion, were pondering possible avenues of spirit. Since you have chimed in, it has been nothing but an argument that I am still working through to get back to the original topic. You say you don't think a spirit could pass through a lifeless planet, fine, and just leave it at that. There was a reason no one had responded to your first post in this thread, and it wasn't because we didn't read it. I agree, Tamrin you are very clever, for sure. Just try not to let it take you astray. This topic was trying to be for fun, I would like it to return to that. ?? YOU responded to my first post in this thread in the very next post!? I had made a reasonable point and YOU thanked me for it!? (BTW, you are now twisting my words as to the lifeless planet bit). You are right I did misread, my apologies. I don't think the local pub was too kind to my brain this morning HAHA. I did respond but it was only to explain the topic we were discussing, not to argue its total existence. Granted the Gaia topic hadn't crossed my mind, but it hadn't limited the current possibilities in question. Mostly I just want this all to end, and now your arguing with the administrator on this thread. How far are you going to take this? I have resigned to let you think what you will, can you not do the same for others?
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 16:40:08 GMT
Post by Tamrin on Mar 2, 2014 16:40:08 GMT
How far are you going to take this? To the resolution of the public and personal attack on this thread.
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 17:03:05 GMT
Post by sammy on Mar 2, 2014 17:03:05 GMT
Will you please open your opinion to a different or new thread? As this is not the topic in this one. This is the last I will respond to this subject in this thread. We are discussing possibilities within a field based from eye witness accounts of paranormal events, and that are purported by parapsychology.
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 21:32:34 GMT
Post by Tamrin on Mar 2, 2014 21:32:34 GMT
Will you please open your opinion to a different or new thread? As this is not the topic in this one. The personal attack, of which you continue to be a party, occurred on this thread.
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 21:39:44 GMT
Post by Tamrin on Mar 2, 2014 21:39:44 GMT
Some people I can chat to with a modest amount of comedic rhetoric some I have to hit with a large sldge hammer. This line is wearing more than a bit thin. Just trying to jokingly ask for restraint in the use of wording that is all. I do humour, but your joke is lost on me. As well as pointing out where I have breached the rules here, please show where I missed your "comedic rhetoric."
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 23:28:02 GMT
Post by billmcelligott on Mar 2, 2014 23:28:02 GMT
Bro. Philip please just discuss the topic in hand and stop the massage of your ego.
If it makes you happy yes your right I am an idiot and you are all powerful.
Like the man said if you don't get it you don't get it.
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
-0+
Mar 2, 2014 23:49:08 GMT
Post by Tamrin on Mar 2, 2014 23:49:08 GMT
Bro. Philip please just discuss the topic in hand and stop the massage of your ego. If it makes you happy yes your right I am an idiot and you are all powerful. Like the man said if you don't get it you don't get it. That was the worst back-handed apology I have ever encountered (a simple "sorry" would have been nice). Still, I guess with YOUR ego that is all anyone can hope for from you, so we will move on.
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 3, 2014 17:44:16 GMT
Post by billmcelligott on Mar 3, 2014 17:44:16 GMT
Bro. Philip please just discuss the topic in hand and stop the massage of your ego. If it makes you happy yes your right I am an idiot and you are all powerful. Like the man said if you don't get it you don't get it. That was the worst back-handed apology I have ever encountered (a simple "sorry" would have been nice). Still, I guess with YOUR ego that is all anyone can hope for from you, so we will move on. No we won't I have had enough of you. too many complaints form other users. tried to let you have your head but you are only interested in oneupmanship the forum will be better without you.
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 4, 2014 17:43:41 GMT
Post by sammy on Mar 4, 2014 17:43:41 GMT
I just came up with this today, and thought you all would enjoy this. Things are a bit more clear for me now!
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 4, 2014 23:56:02 GMT
Post by sammy on Mar 4, 2014 23:56:02 GMT
So I ran with this idea. I had many failed attempts getting the three diagrams to fit. Eventually I realized it only fit one way. Here is the revised version. I noticed it also portrayed a person in the shadow of a pyramid.
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 5, 2014 1:05:09 GMT
Post by sammy on Mar 5, 2014 1:05:09 GMT
The story of the "36 Righteous Men" always had me intrigued. I had originally put in 36 total straight lines going up and down. It was actually a big part of coming to this final design. There is still 36 if you don't count the outline of the pyramid.
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 8, 2014 16:35:01 GMT
Post by sammy on Mar 8, 2014 16:35:01 GMT
I have a more sensible diagram. Still needs fine tuning but much closer to what I have been aiming for. The placements are new however. Energy (top/light) Mass (bottom/shadow) Consciousness (left/birth and right/death).
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 15, 2014 15:51:07 GMT
Post by nventr on Mar 15, 2014 15:51:07 GMT
Oh, Sammy! This is fabulous! I have worked and worked with the infinity and wondered where to place it. My best effort was to make the infinity vertical, but when the paths are split you can place the infinity in between. That has got to be the answer!
The bottom part of the first picture, with the man sitting in the pyramid, fully depicts “The Diamond Sutra” or Grail Path.
Totally love this!
|
|
|
-0+
Mar 15, 2014 16:28:36 GMT
Post by sammy on Mar 15, 2014 16:28:36 GMT
Oh, Sammy! This is fabulous! I have worked and worked with the infinity and wondered where to place it. My best effort was to make the infinity vertical, but when the paths are split you can place the infinity in between. That has got to be the answer! The bottom part of the first picture, with the man sitting in the pyramid, fully depicts “The Diamond Sutra” or Grail Path. Totally love this! HAHA! Im so glad you agree! I love the diamond sutra! A great perspective for cutting the rough edges. Was it you who first told me about it? 4 years ago seems so long now! I actually have been working on a lot better diagram. Im still putting all my options on the table before I start a new one, but I am getting close I think to a 2D answer, with 3d capabilities.
|
|