Post by The Ancient on Jun 9, 2021 20:50:55 GMT
If there is an ancient pi, wouldn't it stand to measure that there is an ancient phi?
Ancient pi and phi vs. modern phi and pi
Modern 3.1415926 pi and modern phi 1.61803 do not exist in the design of pyramid Khufu. Ancient pi 3.142857... and ancient phi 1.61983457 however do.
Modernly, √1.61803 multiplied by 3.1415926 equals 3.996162.
Anciently, 1.61983457 multiplied by 3.142857... equals 3.9999999
280/220 is 1.2727... multiplied by itself equals 1.61983457. Let's look at the famed 4/√phi scenario.
Modernly, 4/√1.61803 equals 3.144609
Anciently, 4/√1.61983457 equals 3.142857...
3.142857... is 22/7 the undisputed ancient pi of pyramid Khufu. What I just did here is mathematically establish that the pyramid of Khufu is 280 cubits in altitude and is not 279.843978 as claimed by the Gurus. I understand how you determine slant height of the pyramid to half the base, those numbers do not add up from modern pi and phi just as I've as shown. There is a huge difference between modern phi and, ancient phi as designed in the great pyramid. These are two numerically different constants sharing the same symbol and in that blur, cultism thrives. There is no question that the ancients used a 220 adjacent right angle base as a whole number cubit. There is no question that the ancients scaled 22 digits multiplied by 10 for a 220 adjacent. The question now becomes, why would the Egyptians use 279.843978 multiplied by 10 and not 28 digits, one Egyptian royal cubit rod multiplied by 10 for a 280 whole number cubit altitude format? Was this attempt to fit the modern Guru's template of modern phi? Or logically, was there an ancient phi? After all there was an ancient pi the scholarly established 3.142857...That would logically suggest that ancient phi would also have a different number value than modern phi and would also share the same symbol. This would reason that constants have families that are in a categorized geometric series as these do.
Ancient pi and phi vs. modern phi and pi
Modern 3.1415926 pi and modern phi 1.61803 do not exist in the design of pyramid Khufu. Ancient pi 3.142857... and ancient phi 1.61983457 however do.
Modernly, √1.61803 multiplied by 3.1415926 equals 3.996162.
Anciently, 1.61983457 multiplied by 3.142857... equals 3.9999999
280/220 is 1.2727... multiplied by itself equals 1.61983457. Let's look at the famed 4/√phi scenario.
Modernly, 4/√1.61803 equals 3.144609
Anciently, 4/√1.61983457 equals 3.142857...
3.142857... is 22/7 the undisputed ancient pi of pyramid Khufu. What I just did here is mathematically establish that the pyramid of Khufu is 280 cubits in altitude and is not 279.843978 as claimed by the Gurus. I understand how you determine slant height of the pyramid to half the base, those numbers do not add up from modern pi and phi just as I've as shown. There is a huge difference between modern phi and, ancient phi as designed in the great pyramid. These are two numerically different constants sharing the same symbol and in that blur, cultism thrives. There is no question that the ancients used a 220 adjacent right angle base as a whole number cubit. There is no question that the ancients scaled 22 digits multiplied by 10 for a 220 adjacent. The question now becomes, why would the Egyptians use 279.843978 multiplied by 10 and not 28 digits, one Egyptian royal cubit rod multiplied by 10 for a 280 whole number cubit altitude format? Was this attempt to fit the modern Guru's template of modern phi? Or logically, was there an ancient phi? After all there was an ancient pi the scholarly established 3.142857...That would logically suggest that ancient phi would also have a different number value than modern phi and would also share the same symbol. This would reason that constants have families that are in a categorized geometric series as these do.
Further, if you go look at the royal Egyptian cubit rod, we’ve discussed where ancient phi fits in. Where exactly will modern phi naturally ratio into these real time cubit measures? After all, the royal Egyptian cubit rod built the great pyramid. You can site all the great pyramid measures you want, there is a difference between a blueprint and the final build. You can ask any engineer, is that the product you designed or what modern build manufactures? If measures are not cubit rod rationale, they can not be real.