|
|
Post by rembrandt on Nov 1, 2010 1:05:14 GMT
If the lady in the Chaplin film was using a cell phone to whom was she speaking? Was there the series of towers that is necessary for cell networks? It is interesting at least.
|
|
|
|
Post by vajranagini on Nov 1, 2010 1:17:01 GMT
Well i knew an alchemist who told me he had elementals hanging around, and managed to show me a few of them. He pointed at a nearby candle one evening, and said "There's a salamander watching us out of that flame". I am rather nearsighted without my glasses, and straining to see from my vantage point I saw what looked like a large flake or balloon of black soot around the wick. I got up to look more closely, and there was a tiny black creature, peering out of the flame back at me with two eyes like sparks. It was very like the amphibian in silhouette, being completely black with a glowing outline, but this one was indubitably standing free of the flame;there was no mistaking it for a trick of the light, or of combustion (sometimes there can be a carbon buildup on candlewicks that takes the form of a bubble or a butterfly shape But there was no trace of any such thing left behind when I checked later.) We stared at each other for quite some time, I not quite believing my eyes, until the alchemist called over to me and I turned my head to reply. When I turned my gaze back to the candle, it had vanished like the proverbial leprechaun. I would have zeroed in for a closer look but I decided if it really was a fire elemental it might be a good idea to treat it like an unfamiliar animal and keep a certain distance between me and it. But I did get close enough to conclude that there was in fact a living entity of some sort in the flame of that candle, and I was not just 'seeing things". Later when I read Crowley's account of having seen two actual "heinzelmannchen" (gnomes) of German and Swiss legend playing together in the mountains of Switzerland, I knew what he was talking about. "There was nothing "unsubstantial" about them" There was nothing unsubstantial about what I saw, either. And there would have been no time to bring a camera to bear. But I saw what I saw.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zita on Nov 1, 2010 3:47:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Zita on Nov 1, 2010 3:55:39 GMT
Well i knew an alchemist who told me he had elementals hanging around, and managed to show me a few of them. He pointed at a nearby candle one evening, and said "There's a salamander watching us out of that flame". I am rather nearsighted without my glasses, and straining to see from my vantage point I saw what looked like a large flake or balloon of black soot around the wick. I got up to look more closely, and there was a tiny black creature, peering out of the flame back at me with two eyes like sparks. It was very like the amphibian in silhouette, being completely black with a glowing outline, but this one was indubitably standing free of the flame; Dr Harry Oldfield has filmed elementals (?) stepping out of crystals. He uses special filters he has developed that breaks up the usual order of light to see what is happening at more subtle levels. I took my camera with his lens to lodge one night. When lodge was closed I tooks some pics.. and was amazed to see rainbow light coming from a sword, and even more amazing a rainbow light reaching from one banner to another. |
|
KNOs1s
Member
I am inclined agree or disagree based on the quality and quantity of proffered information.
Posts: 1,330 
|
Post by KNOs1s on Nov 1, 2010 15:44:26 GMT
Yes, that's definitely an elephant in the room! ;D At 4:10, you can see that it's rounded on the end, and could possibly be a hearing device similar to this:  I *so* would love it if it was a time traveler, which is why I'm hoping for definitive proof.  |
|
|
|
Post by vajranagini on Nov 3, 2010 13:43:15 GMT
I definitely accept the possibility of 'time travel' in a psychic form; I've seen PLENTY of (subjective) evidence that such things are indeed possible, both future and past. But definitely NOT in a physical form. If that were actually possible we would see MUCH MORE evidence of it than we have. Humans aren't smart enough not to leave "traces" of their presence, and it would have already shown itself in anomalies like inexplicable DNA aberrations and contamination by modern-day pollutants.
|
|
KNOs1s
Member
I am inclined agree or disagree based on the quality and quantity of proffered information.
Posts: 1,330
|
Post by KNOs1s on Nov 3, 2010 15:25:09 GMT
I've read many books on physics which suggest travelling *physically* through time is possible. As Einstein proved, Time is bent by gravity, and we 'travel' through time utilizing the Theory of Relativity. All that is necessary is to bend time enough that it becomes a 'loop', and you can travel any which way inside that loop you like. Still, I am not here arguing in favor of this footage containing a time traveler, nor that because it is *possible* that it has ever been accomplished to such a degree in the future or in the past.
|
|
|
|
Post by offramp on Mar 5, 2020 16:44:59 GMT
The Coral Castle is easliy explained in much simpler terms: www.livescience.com/history/060328_coral_castle.html"There is one detail that virtually all agree on: since the reclusive Leedskalnin spent nearly thirty years working mostly at night and away from prying eyes, no one actually saw him move the coral. Since no one saw the blocks actually being moved, no one can state for certain that the task was accomplished by Leedskalnin alone. The claim that Leedskalnin didn't use modern (post-1920s) tools is obviously true, but the mistake is in assuming that modern tools are required to move the large blocks of coral.
Ultimately—and ironically—the solution may lie in Leedskalnin's own simple explanation: that he did it using principles of weight and leverage. "I have discovered the secrets of the pyramids," he said, employing the same methods used by ancient Egyptians. If Leedskalnin was being truthful, then the mystery is solved, for the methods by which the Egyptian pyramids could be constructed are well understood (see, for example, Mark Lehner's 1997 book The Complete Pyramids).
Photos exist of large tripods, pulleys, and winches at the Coral Castle site, and several sources (e.g., Wallace Wallington's Web site http://www.theforgottentechnology.com) demonstrate how massive weights can be moved by one or two people using simple physics. (The comparisons to Egypt's pyramids are a red herring; there are vast differences in weight, material, and complexity between the castle's coral slabs and the huge stone pyramids at Giza. Because coral is porous, large blocks appear heavier than they actually are.)
Many mystery mongers arrogantly assume that those living in earlier times (such as Leedskalnin, or the ancient Egyptians) were not clever or resourceful enough to possibly have created impressive engineering feats without extraterrestial aid or mysterious powers. This view betrays an ignorance of history and sadly underestimates human ingenuity. It seems likely that if scientists haven't explained the Coral Castle specifically, it's because there's little to "explain." The Coral Castle mystery seems to be simply a matter of poorly-informed people who reject a mundane reality in favor of a fanciful myth." |
|
2211
Member
INTELLIGENTIBUS VERITATEM
Posts: 104
|
Post by 2211 on Mar 18, 2020 10:56:48 GMT
The Coral Castle is easliy explained in much simpler terms: www.livescience.com/history/060328_coral_castle.html"There is one detail that virtually all agree on: since the reclusive Leedskalnin spent nearly thirty years working mostly at night and away from prying eyes, no one actually saw him move the coral. Since no one saw the blocks actually being moved, no one can state for certain that the task was accomplished by Leedskalnin alone. The claim that Leedskalnin didn't use modern (post-1920s) tools is obviously true, but the mistake is in assuming that modern tools are required to move the large blocks of coral.
Ultimately—and ironically—the solution may lie in Leedskalnin's own simple explanation: that he did it using principles of weight and leverage. "I have discovered the secrets of the pyramids," he said, employing the same methods used by ancient Egyptians. If Leedskalnin was being truthful, then the mystery is solved, for the methods by which the Egyptian pyramids could be constructed are well understood (see, for example, Mark Lehner's 1997 book The Complete Pyramids).
Photos exist of large tripods, pulleys, and winches at the Coral Castle site, and several sources (e.g., Wallace Wallington's Web site http://www.theforgottentechnology.com) demonstrate how massive weights can be moved by one or two people using simple physics. (The comparisons to Egypt's pyramids are a red herring; there are vast differences in weight, material, and complexity between the castle's coral slabs and the huge stone pyramids at Giza. Because coral is porous, large blocks appear heavier than they actually are.)
Many mystery mongers arrogantly assume that those living in earlier times (such as Leedskalnin, or the ancient Egyptians) were not clever or resourceful enough to possibly have created impressive engineering feats without extraterrestial aid or mysterious powers. This view betrays an ignorance of history and sadly underestimates human ingenuity. It seems likely that if scientists haven't explained the Coral Castle specifically, it's because there's little to "explain." The Coral Castle mystery seems to be simply a matter of poorly-informed people who reject a mundane reality in favor of a fanciful myth."The secret of Coral Castle wasn't about anti gravity/alien tech and flotation, it goes way beyond that. Ed created Rock Gate Park now known as Coral Castle, the latest name was invented or perhaps stolen in 1958 from a nearby location where limestone/coral rock was used to built an actual castle like structure. During the same year George Hunt Williamson was the first individual who stated Ed knew the secrets of gravity and relates it to UFO operations, seven years after Ed passed away. Ed was York Rite. |
|
|
|
Post by peter2 on Mar 18, 2020 23:29:18 GMT
It is common for local humans to explain away phenomena without bothering to test the explanation.
The explanation is speculation but speculation without experiment does not produce science (knowledge) - a critical problem in Freemasonry
|
|
2211
Member
INTELLIGENTIBUS VERITATEM
Posts: 104
|
Post by 2211 on Mar 19, 2020 1:09:15 GMT
Most humans regurgitate information. It is also important to not cast pearls before swine. These secrets are shrouded in mystery for a reason.
|
|
2211
Member
INTELLIGENTIBUS VERITATEM
Posts: 104
|
Post by 2211 on Mar 19, 2020 1:34:18 GMT
Regurgitater  I see clear skies in China and Italy
There is certainly nothing new under the sun here.
|
|
Oct 25, 2024 19:03:35 GMT
Oct 25, 2024 19:03:35 GMT
