Natural numbers as in a x b as standard order of operations?
There are many different routes to a same sum. In one format or another, math is discipline, pure s the mind. The ancients practiced this from Pythagorean's, the construction and mathematical output of Pyramid Khufu, to the art of a column. I am not sure why that is not so evident today. One could easily make the argument, how far we have fallen? This is how I've always known the vast area in which you mentioned. I would really like to understand more of what you have to say and most importantly, your view. In forbearance of the background as commented.
Natural numbers being integers and not fractions, irrational or complex. The latter types manifest in the harmonics generated by the trills in the "song" of manifestation. This means that the integers have more power in the process of manifesting Reality.
> like to understand more of what you have to say
I am writing about Reality that is at the edge of my perception. My comments on numbers are sensate in origin rather than conceptual. Still, having an incentive to perceive is always useful.
Lets first decide on how we see it. This algorithm is what I once sought for that can be measured. Metacomponents, performance components, knowledge acquisition components or other is secondary and will develop itself in searching. Here, math is rational. Thus, the interrogatory into cubits.
elijah, How clairvoyant. How is it you knowledge this? (origins of ?) A segment and an angle is all that’s needed to energize a cubit rod in right angle theorem (as shown in the Rhind Papyrus no.53) See attachments:
The components (the Gods as once viewed yes) now are geometrically driven and exercise, interpret, graduate and reason together. Each hierarchy is new levels of communication such as shown and illustrated earlier in attachment “cubits”. All supported by angles hidden inside the square. In this case, it's hypotenuses (or diameter) as the pillar. Thus, squaring actions inside a circumscribed circumference, for these were the Ancient Days.
Peter2, The unfinished pyramid and all seeing eye should be viewed as a mathematical means for, revisit the picture..
Peter2, Since you withdrawn thought, I will leave you with this final one. There are many disciplines derived, but more specifically yours: The unfinished pyramid and all seeing eye. Lets first decide on how to see it. From the base, basic conscientiousness, developed compartments: Metacomponents, performance components, knowledge acquisition components and other in tiers of communication of higher levels of being. All summed up in an evolving platonic solid. Ever wonder why you loose the ability? Was it something you should have not ate, drank or just too many EMF's? Focused mathematical sequence is the proper gateway, otherwise you waste a lifetime in the mountains without speaking a word and still end up back here cycling the same setbacks like a dog chasing its tail. Your question should be, when looking at Giza in a mathematical component sense with the logistics of distributive cubit laws on display, did Khufu make it beyond? For this was the way of our ancients... The Eye of Providence, fractional disciplined portions of sight or you will never have coherent bearings.