|
Post by whistler on Sept 7, 2010 8:17:14 GMT
In 1902 the Head of all True Freemasons suggested to some English women join Freemasonry in France - "Le Droit Human Lodge No 1" was the Co-Masonic Lodge that Annie Besant along with Miss Arundale 33o and 5 others were duly initiated passed and raised and empowered to form the first Co-Masonic Lodge in England. founded under the name of "Human Duty" The first Lodge room was the drawing room of Mrs Jacob Bright a founding member - in that drawing room Lodge meetings were held, and initiations, passing and raisings performed at length until they reached the number of 35
|
|
|
Post by jerohm on Sept 7, 2010 11:32:07 GMT
Yes, it was an humble begining, but what a wonderful begining ! When Human Duty has been created, LDH has just 10 years old, and that was one of the first step of the internationalisation of cofreemasonry... Unfortunatelly, in France, we often forget (or don't know) that Annie Besant and the Arundales have worked a lot to expand LDH all over the world.
Without their induction, LDH would be only French today...
|
|
|
Post by Leo on Sept 7, 2010 11:56:24 GMT
Ah, yes.......a humble start. I feel Bro. Annie wouldn't have wanted it any other way. We within Co-Freemasonry have much to be grateful for.
Bro. Whistler, thanks for this reminder.
|
|
|
Post by whistler on Sept 7, 2010 11:58:13 GMT
Spread it did in the old Empire just 25 years later there were in the UK and Ireland 51 Craft lodges 9 Mark Lodges 6 Royal Arch Chapters 6 Rose Croix Chapters In South Africa 6 Craft lodges 2 Mark Lodges 1 Royal Arch Chapter 1 Rose Croix Chapter In India 23 Craft lodges 1 Mark Lodge 2 Royal Arch Chapters 63 Rose Croix Chapters In Australasia 16 Craft lodges 3 Mark Lodges 4Royal Arch Chapters 4 Rose Croix Chapters
|
|
|
Post by jerohm on Sept 7, 2010 12:02:35 GMT
Oh, one question : do you know which ritual has been worked by Human Duty when it was consecrated ? Was it the continental ritual ? Lauderdale ritual ? Other ? (sorry for my English that need some improvements... I settle down in November in London, hope to improve it and my knowledges in British cofreemasonry too )
|
|
|
Post by whistler on Sept 27, 2010 8:38:28 GMT
Sorry Jerohm, I don't know
|
|
|
Post by seekeroftruth on Sept 27, 2010 12:38:39 GMT
as the lodge was founded back in the beginning of the 1900's I would hazard to say that the ritual used was the AASR. But then I could be completely wrong. Once in England you can pay the lodge a visit and find out
|
|
|
Post by aogop on Feb 17, 2011 20:26:11 GMT
Who was the "Head of all True Freemasons?" Not fishing, just curious.
|
|
|
Post by anubis on Feb 17, 2011 22:41:16 GMT
Who was the "Head of all True Freemasons?" Not fishing, just curious. TGAOTU? That would be my guess. ;D
|
|
|
Post by sid on Feb 18, 2011 6:08:38 GMT
Who was the "Head of all True Freemasons?" Not fishing, just curious. A true Freemason.
|
|
|
Post by aogop on Feb 18, 2011 20:53:45 GMT
I asked wondering if it was the GM of the UGLE at the time, or a GO who is called that as a titular position since there was no name given. I am not concerned with regularity and all that. I was just curious who was all involved and if there was a record of that particular discussion. I think it would interesting masonic history.
|
|
|
Post by corab on Feb 22, 2011 22:45:26 GMT
Lodge Human Duty No. 6 was inaugurated on 26th September 1902 at 24 Albemarle Street, London. The ritual worked at the time was a translation of that worked in France - nowadays known as the Georges Martin Ritual. Later, in 1904, the first edition of a new ritual called the Dharma ritual was introduced, from which our present-day Lauderdale Ritual is derived.
h.g.w.,
Cora
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
Post by Tamrin on Feb 27, 2011 2:45:21 GMT
Who was the "Head of all True Freemasons?" Not fishing, just curious. According to Leadbeater: BTW, Comte Saint Germain "died" this day 1784.
|
|
|
Post by corab on Feb 28, 2011 1:08:05 GMT
Thanks Tamrin. It is worth noting that although many do, by far not all Co-Freemasons follow Leadbeater's assertions in this respect. Such is the beauty of absolute freedom of conscience and total absence of dogma. Certainly our International Constitution is very clear in our Order's position on dogma: The International Order of Co-Freemasonry Le Droit Humain professes no dogma. Its purposes is the search for Truth. Thus, in Lodges, discussions and debates on social or religious questions cannot, under any circumstance, have any other purpose than that of enlightening its members and making it possible for them, through a fuller understanding, to fulfil their duties as Freemasons.I have personally always felt uncomfortable with the assertion of the principle of THOATF; and much prefer the optional wording in our rituals which avoids reference to the unnecessary and 'mediating' principle between TGAOTU and myself as introduced by someone else's belief system - The Ascended Master Teachings. Thankfully, we work on the basis of respecting choice. The rituals that were crafted on that basis still contain reference to THOATF for those who prefer to work on that basis, and for those who don't, there is optional wording. And then there is, of course, the Georges Martin ritual, which is the ritual worked by Lodge Human Duty when Co-Freemasonry first came to British shores, and of which many, many elements are still present in the Lauderdale and Verulam workings today. No THOATF in there, and contrary to popular belief, it is no less spiritual and esoteric than any of the more elaborate rituals commonly worked in English-speaking lodges of our Order. Ah, the beauty of variety ;D With h.g.w., Cora
|
|
|
Post by whistler on Mar 1, 2011 7:56:18 GMT
Tamrin ref: BTW, Comte Saint Germain "died" this day 1784. Which death was this?
|
|
|
Post by whistler on Mar 1, 2011 8:12:50 GMT
Corab - Such is our Masonry ref"Its purposes is the search for Truth. Thus, in Lodges, discussions and debates on social or religious questions cannot, under any circumstance, have any other purpose than that of enlightening its members and making it possible for them, through a fuller understanding, to fulfil their duties as Freemasons." In some Masonic Flavours I understand the discussion of Religion or Politic is forbidden?" RE Who was the "Head of all True Freemasons? Try Who is the Head of all True Freemasons? A Co-Mason is able to decide who/ what - he, she or it - is for them selves. An Other example of the "Free" Nature of both the Easter Order and LDH - One is not required to be a Christian to join the Rose Croix -Though a Christian I am sure would find much in the ritual that sits very comfortably with their religious faith. Our Ritual is similar but different to the Male Craft - and reveals a drama that substantially pre-dates Christianity
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
Post by Tamrin on Mar 1, 2011 10:56:50 GMT
Tamrin ref: BTW, Comte Saint Germain "died" this day 1784.
Which death was this? The one in 1784. (hence the inverted commas)
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
Post by Tamrin on Mar 1, 2011 11:05:20 GMT
Try Who is the Head of all True Freemasons? Do you thus consider all who do not accept, or even reject, his headship not to be "True Freemasons"?
|
|
Tamrin
Member
Nosce te ipsum
Posts: 3,586
|
Post by Tamrin on Mar 1, 2011 11:08:15 GMT
In 1902 the Head of all True Freemasons suggested to some English women join Freemasonry in France By this I gather you consider the HOATF to be a real entity and not just an allegorical abstraction.
|
|
|
Post by corab on Mar 1, 2011 11:35:11 GMT
Try Who is the Head of all True Freemasons? Do you thus consider all who do not accept, or even reject, his headship not to be "True Freemasons"? Thank you again - this is part of my inner resistance to the term "True Freemasons", but the stronger is the implied assertion of the intermediacy of a force between TGAOTU and myself. I can no more disprove the existence of this force than I can prove the existence of a Creative Principle, and I won't deny anyone his or her right to exercise these beliefs in the context of their own religious practices - but in my strictly personal opinion Freemasonry ought to be free of dogma and therefore free of our own religious practices. With h.g.w., Cora
|
|